AIMS. Clinical presentation of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) mimics acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and does not allow differentiation. We aimed to develop a clinical score to estimate the probability of TTS and to distinguish TTS from ACS in the acute stage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with TTS were recruited from the International Takotsubo Registry ( www.takotsubo-registry.com) and ACS patients from the leading hospital in Zurich. A multiple logistic regression for the presence of TTS was performed in a derivation cohort (TTS, n = 218; ACS, n = 436). The best model was selected and formed a score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) with seven variables, and each was assigned a score value: female sex 25, emotional trigger 24, physical trigger 13, absence of ST-segment depression (except in lead aVR) 12, psychiatric disorders 11, neurologic disorders 9, and QTc prolongation 6 points. The area under the curve (AUC) for the resulting score was 0.971 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-0.98] and using a cut-off value of 40 score points, sensitivity was 89% and specificity 91%. When patients with a score of ≥50 were diagnosed as TTS, nearly 95% of TTS patients were correctly diagnosed. When patients with a score ≤31 were diagnosed as ACS, ∼95% of ACS patients were diagnosed correctly. The score was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort (TTS, n = 173; ACS, n = 226), resulting in a score AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.87-0.93). CONCLUSION: The InterTAK Diagnostic Score estimates the probability of the presence of TTS and is able to distinguish TTS from ACS with a high sensitivity and specificity.

A novel clinical score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome: results from the International Takotsubo Registry / Ghadri, Jr; Cammann, Vl; Jurisic, S; Seifert, B; Napp, Lc; Diekmann, J; Bataiosu, Dr; D'Ascenzo, F; Ding, Kj; Sarcon, A; Kazemian, E; Birri, T; Ruschitzka, F; Lüscher, Tf; Templin, C; InterTAK co-investigators: Jaguszewski, M; Franke, J; Katus, Ha; Burgdorf, C; Schunkert, H; Thiele, H; Bauersachs, J; Tschöpe, C; Rajan, L; Michels, G; Pfister, R; Ukena, C; Böhm, M; Erbel, R; Cuneo, A; Jacobshagen, C; Hasenfuß, G; Karakas, M; Koenig, W; Rottbauer, W; Said, Sm; Braun-Dullaeus, Rc; Cuculi, F; Banning, A; Fischer, Ta; Vasankari, T; Airaksinen, Kej; Fijalkowski, M; Rynkiewicz, A; Opolski, G; Dworakowski, R; Maccarthy, P; Kaiser, C; Osswald, S; Galiuto, L; Crea, F; Dichtl, W; Franz, Wm; Empen, K; Felix, Sb; Delmas, C; Lairez, O; Erne, P; Frantz, S; Prasad, A; Bax, Jj. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 1388-9842. - 19:8(2017), pp. 1036-1042. [10.1002/ejhf.683]

A novel clinical score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome: results from the International Takotsubo Registry

Galiuto L;
2017

Abstract

AIMS. Clinical presentation of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) mimics acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and does not allow differentiation. We aimed to develop a clinical score to estimate the probability of TTS and to distinguish TTS from ACS in the acute stage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with TTS were recruited from the International Takotsubo Registry ( www.takotsubo-registry.com) and ACS patients from the leading hospital in Zurich. A multiple logistic regression for the presence of TTS was performed in a derivation cohort (TTS, n = 218; ACS, n = 436). The best model was selected and formed a score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) with seven variables, and each was assigned a score value: female sex 25, emotional trigger 24, physical trigger 13, absence of ST-segment depression (except in lead aVR) 12, psychiatric disorders 11, neurologic disorders 9, and QTc prolongation 6 points. The area under the curve (AUC) for the resulting score was 0.971 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-0.98] and using a cut-off value of 40 score points, sensitivity was 89% and specificity 91%. When patients with a score of ≥50 were diagnosed as TTS, nearly 95% of TTS patients were correctly diagnosed. When patients with a score ≤31 were diagnosed as ACS, ∼95% of ACS patients were diagnosed correctly. The score was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort (TTS, n = 173; ACS, n = 226), resulting in a score AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.87-0.93). CONCLUSION: The InterTAK Diagnostic Score estimates the probability of the presence of TTS and is able to distinguish TTS from ACS with a high sensitivity and specificity.
2017
tako tsubo; broken heart syndrome; acute coronary syndromeacute syndrome
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A novel clinical score (InterTAK Diagnostic Score) to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome: results from the International Takotsubo Registry / Ghadri, Jr; Cammann, Vl; Jurisic, S; Seifert, B; Napp, Lc; Diekmann, J; Bataiosu, Dr; D'Ascenzo, F; Ding, Kj; Sarcon, A; Kazemian, E; Birri, T; Ruschitzka, F; Lüscher, Tf; Templin, C; InterTAK co-investigators: Jaguszewski, M; Franke, J; Katus, Ha; Burgdorf, C; Schunkert, H; Thiele, H; Bauersachs, J; Tschöpe, C; Rajan, L; Michels, G; Pfister, R; Ukena, C; Böhm, M; Erbel, R; Cuneo, A; Jacobshagen, C; Hasenfuß, G; Karakas, M; Koenig, W; Rottbauer, W; Said, Sm; Braun-Dullaeus, Rc; Cuculi, F; Banning, A; Fischer, Ta; Vasankari, T; Airaksinen, Kej; Fijalkowski, M; Rynkiewicz, A; Opolski, G; Dworakowski, R; Maccarthy, P; Kaiser, C; Osswald, S; Galiuto, L; Crea, F; Dichtl, W; Franz, Wm; Empen, K; Felix, Sb; Delmas, C; Lairez, O; Erne, P; Frantz, S; Prasad, A; Bax, Jj. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 1388-9842. - 19:8(2017), pp. 1036-1042. [10.1002/ejhf.683]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ghadri_novel-clinical score-(InterTAK Diagnostic Score)_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.11 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1659399
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 59
  • Scopus 134
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 128
social impact